The purpose of this website is to address environmental concerns in relation to the development of mountain bike trails in Australia’s natural areas
Australia’s biodiversity (the variety of living things) is in serious decline, and human pressures increasingly affect our natural areas. There is growing community concern that escalating tourism-related developments, encouraged by all levels of government, are accelerating these detrimental impacts on natural areas and their ecosystems. There is also an increasing body of scientific literature addressing this topic.
One of these tourism-related developments is the construction of mountain bike trails, particularly the tendency to build them in relatively undisturbed natural and sometimes protected, areas.
Some examples of the detrimental impacts from mountain biking and trail construction are:
- Cumulative impacts on ecosystems are occurring due to the sheer scale of mountain bike trails. One trail construction can be hundreds of kilometres long. These continue to be built throughout Australia, often in extremely ‘ecologically sensitive’ areas such as;
- Steep gullies, that play a vital role as ‘refugia’ for plants and animals and fire protection, yet they are popular for mountain biking adventures and are often damaged and disturbed
- Edge Effects can affect species when trail construction causes changes in the vegetation structure at the edges of their habitat. Edge effects also encourage weeds and can spread serious environmental threats such as Phytophthora (Phytophthora cinnamomi), which can cause permanent damage to ecosystems and landscapes
- Disturbance from machinery during construction, maintenance and biking on trails can detrimentally affect threatened species such as Powerful Owls, Wedge-tailed eagles and Koalas as well as small mammals, reptiles and invertebrates that would be less able to avoid the rapid approach of mountain bikers
- Habitat loss and fragmentation can lead to ‘niche reductions’ for plant and animal species. They lose their ‘homes’ and thus, ecosystems decline
- In summary, this websites aims to add another dimension to the plethora of information available regarding tourism-related mountain biking developments.
It provides information regarding scientific reports on these impacts as well as media articles and grey literature. While we focus on environmental impacts, the social and economic costs to communities from mountain biking developments should not be ignored and information regarding those aspects is supplied.
We hope it will engender more environmental, social and economic consideration by decision-makers, land managers and recreational users of natural areas concerning the development of mountain biking trails and their associated infrastructures.
|This June 26, 2020 news article from New South Wales, Australia, encapsulates land-user conflicts. All stakeholders, particularly the local communities, need to be considered when mountain bike tracks are constructed. Otherwise, scenarios such as described in this article are inevitable.|
|Members of the Central Coast mountain biking community have hit back at calls to have mountain biking disallowed in COSS lands and say they have just as much right to be there as everyone else.|
The feud with environmentalists has been going on for years, with environmentalists arguing riders are damaging sensitive bush areas by making their own trails and jumps.
Riders say there simply aren’t enough trails for the growing number of mountain bikers.
Many photos have been circulated on social media, like this one taken at Kincumber Mountain, showing how some people have taken to booby-trapping trails with logs, rocks and sharpened sticks.
Leif Arnebark is the Founder of the Central Coast Mountain Bike Trail Alliance and is the Secretary of the Central Coast Mountain Bike Club and believes the establishment of more mountain biking infrastructure around the Central Coast would put this issue to bed.
“(Traps) are something that we deal with – there’s not a lot of evidence as most riders that come across a trap usually remove it from the trail straight away to ensure no one else gets hurt,” Arnebark explained.
“The big issue with traps is the placement.
“If it’s around a blind corner for instance there’s real potential to cause serious injury and over the years we have had people get hurt and equipment damaged,” he said.
Other instances include fishing line strung across trails and of cork and nail spikes being scattered on a trail at nearby Bolton Point in the Lake Macquarie State Conservation Area in January.
According to Arnebark, mountain biking trails in the LGA are mostly pre-existing fire trails located within natural reserves and fail to meet the needs of mountain bikers.
“Mountain biking is an approved activity under the COSS Land Strategy, but the problem is Central Coast Council doesn’t have one metre of dedicated mountain biking trails for local riders to use.
“The current fire trails are insufficient to meet our needs in accessibility, technical diversity and length,” Arnebark said.
“The fact is we really don’t have anywhere to ride on the southern end of the Coast and that’s why these unsanctioned trails are being built.
“We realise some of these builds can disturb the natural environment and that’s why the mountain biking community wants to work with council to see a professionally built and sustainable trail network established,” he added.
With council currently engaged in a feasibility study into mountain biking in the Coast’s natural reserves there’s hope for the mountain biking community yet.
The study was launched in 2019 and is currently undergoing review with a final report expected to be made available to the public before the end of the year.
Arnebark hopes the study will recognise Kincumber Mountain as the most suitable reserve to form the mountain biking hub for the southern end of the Central Coast.
“Mountain bikers want council to recognise that we have the same rights as anybody else when it comes to accessing COSS land trails.
“We want to see a master plan for new trails that acknowledges the widespread, intergenerational appeal of mountain biking.
The Community Environment Network (CEN) however, is one group that has been vocal in its criticism of mountain biking in COSS lands.
John Asquith is its Vice President and he believes mountain bikers should not engage in blame shifting when it comes to the damage they’ve wrought.
“It is unquestionable that these unsanctioned biking trails are causing damage to our COSS land and I think it’s extremely important for the mountain biking community’s own credibility that they get the individuals responsible under control,” Asquith said.
“Mountain bikers need to address the issue of stopping this environmental damage up front, not base it on a promise that relies on them getting what they want,”
“I can appreciate that their numbers have grown and that they want more adventure, but the CEN did not spend decades fighting to get these reserves protected so mountain bikers can jump over some rocks.”
Your Voice Our Coast: Mountain Bike Feasibility Study